Brewer Forum

 Forgot password?
 Register
Search
View: 195|Reply: 27

Is it possible to let your beer sit TOO long

[Copy link]

2

Threads

3

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2010-12-30 02:31:02 | Show all posts |Read mode
i've always heard be patient with your beer and let it sit for a while to properly ferment, but is it possible to let it sit for too long? By letting it sit too long could it ruin a beer?
author posts Hot post
Reply

Use magic Report

9

Threads

103

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2010-12-30 02:34:43 | Show all posts
Yes home brew beer does go bad faster than commercial brew. Although, this depends on the alcohol content and type of beer. If you leave a hefeweizen around for 5 years it's going to taste like crap... if you leave a barley-wine around for 5 years it will be delicious  
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

13

Threads

126

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2010-12-30 02:40:36 | Show all posts
Are you talking about in the bottle or in the fermenter?
Letting it sit too long in the fermenter, some will say, will cause problems, but I've heard enough people on hear comment that they leave it for a long time and have no problems.
How long? 3 months? 6 months?
I know a guy who is just plain lazy about the whole bottling process, so he is known to leave his beer on the fermenter for over a year. Personally I would recommend against this, and I don't know if I could wait that long!
I have left a stout in the carboy for almost 6 months and it was my most popular brew.
Now, after you bottle, it really depends on the type of beer.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

9

Threads

103

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2010-12-30 03:06:16 | Show all posts
I read the question too fast, sorry. I was talking about letting it sit in bottles. As for sitting on the fermenter it also depends on style and alcohol content as well, but like dunnright00 said, the amount of time you are talking about is what matters most to answer your question.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

103

Threads

518

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2010-12-30 10:03:34 | Show all posts
There are a lot of posts [here] regarding aging in the primary. From what I've read, with proper sanitation, beer should keep on top of the compacted yeast cake for a while. If it was not that great in the first place, it will be not that great later on.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11

Threads

95

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2010-12-30 10:45:12 | Show all posts
zach, do a search for aging on yeast cake, or aging in the primary, and you will find lots of into on this topic. the opinions are varied.
some will tell you to just go 1-2-3. one week in primary, two weeks in secondary, and three weeks in the bottle.
i tend to use a more batch specific approach that focuses on the actual status of the beer. if the beer has completed fermentation in the primary (that is, the gravity has reached a fairly steady level), then i let it sit for 2-5 more days for a diacetyl rest. if possible, i like to raise the temp during that rest to about 68 (i normally ferment with the house yeast at 62-64).
once that primary period is over, usually 10-12 days, i'll rack to a secondary. in the secondary, i may let the beer sit for 2 weeks or even a month. this largely depends on two factors: (1) the strength of the beer and (2) how lazy I am about bottling. i brewed a stout that is about 9%, so i needed alot of resting time to work out the booziness. i let it sit in the secondary from the week before thanksgiving until 2 days ago.
that all being said, i've let a beer sit in the primary on the yeast cake for 3-4 weeks, and it was fine. the beer had a yeastiness that needed some extra time to age out, but it came around after a couple months.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

20

Threads

492

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2010-12-30 10:58:32 | Show all posts
I try not to go more than 6 months in primary, switch to secondary if I plan to keep aging it. For most beers I can take them out of primary after 3 weeks and keg/bottle, but I'm lazy at times. Still is award winning beer.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

109

Threads

3400

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2010-12-30 11:02:52 | Show all posts
For bottled beers, the type of beer and bottling and storing conditions all play a part. Lighter beers are usually best served young. Bigger beers are very often fine if aged.
Introducing oxygen to the beer at any point past fermentation can lead to eventual oxidation, or a stale or cardboard flavor. (not unwanted in SOME styles) This effect can be accelerated by storing warm.
I think most beer can be kept for well over a year if you practice O2-free bottling techniques and keep the beer cool. Some styles are best served after a year or more of aging to mellow and meld the flavors.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

1

Threads

3

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2010-12-30 12:55:41 | Show all posts
My friend and I made one of our first batches about 12 years ago. He found a 6-pack of them in his basement about 2 months ago. I encouraged him to open a bottle and see how bad it had gotten. He said it smelled fine. He then drank, and spit it out. Said it appeared to still be fine, but with no one else at his house at the time, we agreed that ingesting it was best left to a time when he could be driven to the hospital by someone should the need arise.
Maybe we'll open one up and split it every couple of years for nostalgia.
Then again, I'm not sure my sanitizing techniques were up to the same standards as they are now. I'm sure if it's contaminated, it will be obvious.
Right?
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11

Threads

95

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2010-12-30 13:09:36 | Show all posts
yep
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

0

Threads

2

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2010-12-30 14:28:09 | Show all posts

I'm one of those lazy guys who hates bottling. I left my last Pale Ale in the primary for 11 months and it was horrid. It had an overly bitter after taste. Soapy hops is the best way I have found to describe it. I'm not sure if its the amount hop material left in the trub or what. I used it to experiment with force carbing. Hopefully in my move to kegs I would leave beer in my closet for that long again.  
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

14

Threads

198

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2010-12-30 14:39:53 | Show all posts
Beers low in alcohol and hopping rates will tend to spoil faster, especially if they are not sored in a cool environment and shielded from light once they stop carbonating (ie. in the fridge). If you plan on aging a beer in primary or secondary, you have to take the same factors into consideration: if you put your 1.042 pale next to the water heater, you can bet it will go downhill faster than if you put it in a dark cellar at a constant temperature.
On the other hand, unless you are brewing every week and not drinking your brew at the same rate you are brewing, I very much doubt you'll run into problems. You just need to be sensible about your beer's health (ie. not leave a beer 12 months on the yeast cake, being sanitary in everything you do, pitching the right amount of yeast, etc.).
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

2

Threads

3

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
 Author| Post time 2010-12-31 03:49:06 | Show all posts
So what i'm hearing is the higher the alcohol content the longer you let it sit? and if it's a lighter beer move it along at the standard 1-2-3 pace. That about right?
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

2

Threads

6

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2010-12-31 04:21:17 | Show all posts
I just had a beer from belgium not too long ago, it tasted like absolute garbage. I checked the bottling date, 2003.
YES you can let them sit for too long! har har har
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

14

Threads

198

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2011-1-1 00:48:26 | Show all posts

No, because there's no standard pace. I was told to go by the 1-2-3 method when I started but I felt it wasn't right. There's no way 1-2-3 can account for the huge amount of variables homebrewers have to juggle with every brew, namely lag times, gravity of starting wort, yeast strain, fermentation temperatures, pitch rate, etc. You can most certainly ballpark it, but you have to use the hydrometer wisely to insure proper rests and not getting the beer off the yeast at too fast a pace.
The opposite is also true. I see a lot of people preaching the 4 weeks minimum rule. I might not have the experience that many of those who use this method possess, but I do know that it is as dogmatic as the 1-2-3. Some styles do not age well and would benefit from earlier bottling time. Plus, the time losses can be significant and can mean a hole in the pipeline, wich usually means buying commercial stuff. And that's not very nice.
What I do is religiously sample and check for gravity. The beer will tell you once it's ready to go into the bottles. Yes, that can mean bottling at 10 days or at 6 months.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

0

Threads

3

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2011-1-1 08:46:53 | Show all posts

alcohol abuse!!!
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

1

Threads

3

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2011-1-1 09:45:56 | Show all posts
Yeah, you're right. Might as well have dropped the bottle.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11

Threads

95

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2011-1-2 10:11:58 | Show all posts

i like the relaxed attitude. don't get too worked up and play it out as it goes. get a thief and take some samples as you check your gravity.
relax, don't worry....  
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

61

Threads

4984

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2011-1-2 10:17:50 | Show all posts
If you arbitrarily move your beer, like to follow the silly 1-2-3 rule (or instructions that say move after a week or when bubbles slow down), you will often interrupt fermentation. Because sometimes the yeast won't even begin to ferment your beer until 72 hours after yeast pitch, so if you rush the beer off the yeast on day 7 then you are only allowing the yeast a few days to work. The problem is that yeast don't know how to read so they seldom follow the instructions. They dance to their own tune and its seldom 4 x 4 Time.
This often leads to stuck fermentation because you have removed the beer from the very stuff you need to ferment your beer. The yeast....It can often lead to the same off flavors one gets if they undrpitch their yeast.
Besides, fermenting the beer is just a part of what the yeast do. If you leave the beer alone, they will go back and clean up the byproducts of fermentation that often lead to off flavors. That's why many brewers skip secondary and leave our beers alone in primary for a month. It leaves plenty of time for the yeast to ferment, clean up after themselves and then fall out, leveing our beers crystal clear, with a tight yeast cake.
We have multiple threads about this all over the place, like this one https://www.homebrewtalk.com/f39/ignore-instructions-do-not-bottle-after-5-10-days-78298/
If you leave the beer alone, they will go back and clean up the byproducts of fermentation that often lead to off flavors. That's why many brewers skip secondary and leave our beers alone in primary for a month. It leaves plenty of time for the yeast to ferment, clean up after themselves and then fall out, leveing our beers crystal clear, with a tight yeast cake.
This is the latest recommendation, it is the same one many of us have been giving for several years on here.

THIS is where the latest discussion and all your questions answered.
https://www.homebrewtalk.com/f163/secondary-not-john-palmer-jamil-zainasheff-weigh-176837/
We basically proved that old theory wrong on here 5 years ago, and now the rest fo the brewing community is catching up. Though a lot of old dogs don't tend to follow the latest news, and perpetuate the old stuff.
The autolysis from prolong yeast contact has fallen by the wayside, in fact yeast contact is now seen as a good thing.
All my beers sit a minimum of 1 month in the primary. And I recently bottled a beer that sat in primary for 5.5 months with no ill effects.....
You'll find that more and more recipes these days do not advocate moving to a secondary at all, but mention primary for a month, which is starting to reflect the shift in brewing culture that has occurred in the last 4 years, MOSTLY because of many of us on here, skipping secondary, opting for longer primaries, and writing about it. Recipes in BYO have begun stating that in their magazine. I remember the "scandal" it caused i the letters to the editor's section a month later, it was just like how it was here when we began discussing it, except a lot more civil than it was here. But after the Byo/Basic brewing experiment, they started reflecting it in their recipes.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

0

Threads

1

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2022-12-15 09:40:32 | Show all posts
A rough guide to how long the fermentation process & life of worth

yyvqisgz3dm.jpg

yyvqisgz3dm.jpg

How Long is the Fermentation Process?The time a beer takes to ferment will definitely vary depending on many factors: whether you’re brewing an ale or a lager, what style you’re brewing, the gravity of the brew, and the yeast you’ll be using. The recipe you’re using may have specific instructions on the time you should leave the...

zlbqknynzre.png

zlbqknynzre.png

www.midwestsupplies.com
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

18

Threads

1208

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2022-12-15 10:46:21 | Show all posts
Jan 2, 2011
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

7

Threads

301

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2022-12-15 13:16:03 | Show all posts
Some questions need to age for a while before I'm ready to drink. Oh, wait...
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

23

Threads

287

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2022-12-15 16:46:48 | Show all posts
Haven’t seen @Revvy for a while. Maybe drank too many of those stouts left in primary for 5 months.
I left an imperial stout in primary with some oak chunks for 5 months once a couple years ago. I cannot report that the results were good. Tasted a bit like soy sauce.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

0

Threads

17

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2022-12-16 02:53:52 | Show all posts
Definitely autolysis.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

1

Threads

39

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2022-12-16 09:52:51 | Show all posts
Brewed a couple strong ones just before shoulder surgery 2 days ago. They'll be fine in a long primary probably 2 months.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

7

Threads

301

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2022-12-16 11:40:22 | Show all posts
One thing can be too long: dry hopped DIPA wants to be consumed fresh, but fermentation of these strong beers may continue while hop aromas are fading. Something of a balancing act that makes me consider more aggressive yeast.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

12

Threads

2528

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2022-12-16 16:41:29 | Show all posts

... and don't overlook (in #20) ...

gsx0nai0tgk.png

gsx0nai0tgk.png


a53i341ohju.png

a53i341ohju.png


Maybe we're supposed to be upset that a certain online home brew store would, in 2019, still recommend using secondary.

0havbho15gw.png

0havbho15gw.png

Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

0

Threads

7

Posts

0

Credits

Vip1

Rank: 1

Credits
0
Post time 2022-12-17 10:28:31 | Show all posts
I love home brewing. Ask any question and the answers will very greatly. Everyone has a story to back up their response and some can even can hostile with folks who disagree.

xprcqw4dvt0.gif

xprcqw4dvt0.gif

Yet after reviewing all the answers to almost any question the most common, most thought-out, fact filled answer is still the majority of times....
"It depends"

vttplqvhaz4.gif

vttplqvhaz4.gif

y5hl1jf4qqz.gif

y5hl1jf4qqz.gif

hhvqsubdf1l.gif

hhvqsubdf1l.gif


Merry Christmas folks!
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

Archiver|Mobile|Brewer Forum

2023-4-1 08:50 GMT-8 , Processed in 0.338043 second(s), 37 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2022, Tencent Cloud.

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list